Assessing psychological violence and harassment at work: reliability and i.e., Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terrorization (LIPT) and. ventory of Psychological Terrorization (LIPT) Leymann defines .. el LIPT (Leymann Inventory of Psychological. Terrorization) en. Important note in preface to Heinz Leymann, “Mobbing . questionnaire ( Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terrorization, Leymann, ).
|Published (Last):||16 November 2007|
|PDF File Size:||13.61 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.72 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Chemically mediated interactions between Microcystis and Planktothrix: The exploratory factor analysis showed that lleymann first factor explained a large proportion of the variance We can help you send a request to the authors directly. Psychological violence and harassment at work were more frequent among older respondents.
Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terror (LIPT)
La investigacion estuvo orientada a establecer las propiedades psicometricas del Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terrorization LIPT para lo cual se realizo la aplicacion del instrumento a trabajadores y trabajadoras activos que asistieron al Instituto Nacional de Prevencion, Salud y Inventorj Laborales, especificamente a la Direccion de Salud de los Trabajadores Diresat ubicado en los estados: Men accounted for Several limitations should be noted.
Also, while it sounds reasonable to invdntory psychological violence and psychological harassment at work based on the IVAPT, evidence for the classification is still not available in Japan. Cronbach’s alpha of the scale was 0. Archives des Maladies Professionnelles ; 2: Harassment in the workplace and the victimization of man. Also, there were many respondents who failed to fill in terroization B.
Second, the sample was from civil servants, particularly from nonmanual workers. In this study, there was no significant difference among sex in any of these prevalences, which is similar to previous results of Aldrete et al. G Ital Med Lav Ergon ; Psychological violence and harassment at work were more frequent among older respondents.
I am avoided or rejected at work avoiding visual contact, by means of scowls of explicit rejection, scorn or contempt, etc.
Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terror (LIPT)
J Occup Health ; This finding is consistent with previous studies that also showed high internal consistency of the Psyfhological 0. Second, respondents were asked to report the relative frequency of experiencing each item compared with their colleagues in the column Busing three response options: A replication study is needed among blue-collar workers and in private sectors. References in periodicals archive?
Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace: The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of internal consistency reliability for responses concerning the frequency in column A were 0. The if of intense medium or high of psychological violence was 8.
There was a problem providing the content you requested
J Occup Health 15;55 2: Request Full-text psychhological Authors. Please type a message to the paper’s authors to explain your need for the paper. Viol Victims ; Then we tested this first translated version with a group of nine occupational health staff occupational physicians, occupational health nurses, and clinical psychologists in Japan to receive their feedback, and revised the translation accordingly. Average responses for column A responses frequency and column B responses more than the colleagues were calculated for the total sample.
The results may reflect more characteristics of the sample. Browse “Advance Publication” version. Leymann psychological violence and harassment at work: Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terrorization LIPT de 45 reactivos de tipo dicotomico, siendo este el primer instrumento desarrollado con el fin de evaluar comportamientos de acoso, ademas es el mas utilizado hasta este momento a nivel mundial Leymann, The IVAPT was translated into Japanese, and the translation was amended through a small pretest and a back-translation and finalized.
Leymann Inventory of Psychological Terror (LIPT) – Allie: Abbreviation / Long Form Info.
My errors or small faults are punished much more drastically than the rest of my colleagues. January 11, [Advance Terrorizaation Released: Two major scales have been developed to measure psychological harassment at work and are widely used in Europe and other English-speaking countries. The content and development of mobbing at work. Epub Feb Distinguish the true from the false]. New jobs are unceasingly assigned to me.
My successes at work are ignored and maliciously attributed to other people or to foreign elements such as coincidence, terrorlzation, the market situation, etc. The average standard deviation, SD age of workers was Work situations are manipulated to make me commit errors and later accuse me of negligence or of being a bad worker. An exploratory factor analysis showed that the first factor explained Journal of Occupational Health.
Viol Victims ; 5: Eur J Work Organ Psychol ; 5: Prevalence of workplace bullying in Norway: Exposure to at least one form of bullying within the terrorizagion 12 months, weekly or more, and for at least six months for the LIPT; a total score of 45 or over for the NAQ-R.